RadioTVMagazineMagazineEventsBooksBlogStoreInsiderInsider Extreme
Most PopularCurrent Events & PoliticsFamily & RelationshipsFaith & InspirationPop CultureInterviews

Home > Blog > Stu Blog


Archive for the ‘Global Warming’ Category

The best selling vehicles of 2008 are…

Monday, January 5th, 2009

If you had to narrow down everything you heard about the auto industry last year, you’d probably come up with these two blurbs:

  • People now want hybrids and small cars instead of big trucks because of gas prices and environmental reasons
     
  • The ‘Big 3′ can’t compete anymore
Well, unsurprisingly–the best selling vehicles of 2008–tell a different story.
 
With the skyrocketing gas prices, the incredible melting ice caps, and the “Big 3″ making vehicles “nobody wants”–the top 2 on the list were:
 
1) Ford F-150
2) Chevrolet Silverado
 
Now, I can’t be sure–but those MUST be two-seater electric hydrogen hybrid mini coupes made in Japan…right?
 
Also in the top 10 is the Dodge Ram.  The rest of the list is populated with exactly what it’s always populated with—-mid level sedans.  
 
The Toyota Prius, with all the benefits of tax breaks, universal praise from celebrities and media figures, and the endless publicity that goes along with it, failed to crack the top 10.   
 
That’s not to say hybrids didn’t have a good year –but even a car like the Honda Civic (#5 on the list) that focuses a lot of attention on its hybrid–still had people overwhelmingly choose the regular version. Civic hybrid sales rose over 20% this year—but that brought them to only around 10% of total Civic sales.   The Toyota Camry (#3) has approximately 13% hybrid sales.   For those math geniuses out there, around 90% of people buying these cars are choosing not to buy the hybrid.
 
The truth is, people buy “what they can afford” first, “what they want” second, and “what they think is right to help trees in Australia” a distant third (sometimes the first two switch order: see “Sub Prime Mortgage Crisis”).    
 
If you didn’t like George W. Bush’s pre-Christmas auto bailout, you might remember last Christmas when he buried another car-related holiday surprise:  auto manufacturers must have their entire fleet of cars average 35 miles per gallon by 2020.  
 
Guess how many of the top 10 best-sellers get 35 miles per gallon?
 
Zero.
 
Now, these companies not only have to fight the unions, but also the government telling them to build cars that people don’t want.  Sounds easy.  Happy New Year car companies!
UPDATE: Al Gore must be so annoyed.  He hates it when people save money on gas.
Trucks and sport utility vehicles will outsell cars for the first time since February, according to a December report by Edmunds.com, which tracks industry statistics.

“Despite all the public discussion of fuel efficiency, SUVs and trucks are the industry’s biggest sellers right now as a remarkable number of buyers seem to be compelled by three factors: great deals, low gas prices and winter weather,” said Michelle Krebs of AutoObserver.com, a division of Edmunds.com, in a prepared statement.”

Something I wish I wrote

Friday, August 15th, 2008

Steven Moore, frequent guest on the program, has a brilliant column in the Wall Street Journal about going green.

A couple of the best moments:

But now the environmental movement has morphed into the most authoritarian philosophy in America. The most glaring example of course is the multitrillion-dollar cap-and-trade anti-global warming scheme that would mandate an entire restructuring of our industrial economy. This plan, endorsed by both presidential candidates, would empower climate-change cops to regulate the energy usage and carbon emissions of every industry in America. If we do this, the best estimates are that we could reduce global temperatures by 0.1 degrees by 2050 and save on average about one polar bear a year from early death. But no burden is too great when it comes to helping the planet — even if the progress to be made is infinitesimal. To weigh costs and benefits is regarded as sacrilege — the refuge of global warming “deniers.”

And…

Do-gooders also once wanted to “celebrate diversity,” but total conformity seems to be the aim of those in Seattle these days, where the city has started putting green tags on garbage cans of homeowners who don't recycle. Enthusiasts boast that there is a very positive “Scarlet Letter” effect to subjecting noncompliers to public scorn. So you can almost hear the kitchen conversations: “Jimmy, I don't want you playing with the Williams boys anymore; their family doesn't recycle.” But wait, aren't these the same ACLU members who oppose public registries of multiple sex offenders?

Many studies have shown that the environmental benefits from household recycling are minimal or at least highly exaggerated (because it uses a lot of energy and those recycling trucks emit a lot of greenhouse gases). America is not in danger of ever running out of landfill to store our garbage. For example, a study by Daniel Benjamin, an economist at Clemson, finds that we could store all of America's garbage for the next century within the property of Ted Turner's ranch in Montana, with 50,000 acres undisturbed for the horse and bison.

It's all worth reading-check it out:

Link…

Am I the only one who finds this beautiful?

Wednesday, August 6th, 2008

I took this picture on a recent trip to California. I was standing on (Sunset or Sunrise) Beach (near or in) Los Angeles.

Look closely at the horizon, that's an oil platform. Right off shore. It's closer than it appears in the picture. Certainly much closer than they're proposing we “endure” today. God forbid we ruin our scenery for energy independence. The latest bi-partisan drilling bill says no new drilling within 25 miles of the shore, and states can veto up to 50 miles.

Just look at how spoiled we are. We won't even consider putting an oil platform this close to the shore, because it would “ruin our beaches.” Not because it would actually put oil in the water, but because the oil being pumped might hurt our view of the water.

Yet, even with these platforms just off shore, everyone seemed to be enjoying the beach. Windsurfers winsurfed. Swimmers swam. Tanners tanned.

I guess congress wants energy independence unless it hurts their ability to go on vacation. Or their ability to go to the beach when on vacation. Or their ability to swim at the beach while on vacation. Or the view while they swim at the beach when on vacation.

Can you believe our enemies think we're getting soft?




Please support our sponsors!