RadioTVMagazineMagazineEventsBooksBlogStoreInsiderInsider Extreme
Most PopularCurrent Events & PoliticsFamily & RelationshipsFaith & InspirationPop CultureInterviews

Home > Blog > Stu Blog


Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

A plea to Sarah Palin: Ignore Joe Scarborough

Wednesday, December 1st, 2010

Yes, we all ignore him on a daily basis.  But, I make this plea specifically to Sarah Palin…ignore Joe Scarborough.  It’s truly pathetic how hard he is trying to get attention by getting Palin to respond to his idiotic rant about her supposed evils.  It’s a completely transparent tactic from a guy who simply can’t get anyone to pay attention to him.

I guess you have to do something when your radio show is on a “brief hiatus” for eight months and counting.  But, to be fair, you need at least that long to  try and change a “current two-hour radio show to develop ‘a new three-hour program.’”  Certainly you can’t just stay on for an extra hour.

It’s almost as if they didn’t want him on the air anymore.

Sort of like when his last radio show, which also went on “hiatus” in 2005.  However, that show disappeared so that it could be relaunched “in an even more competitive time period“…which is obviously the problem with a show that failed in four months…not enough competition.

Of course, Scarborough had an excuse for that too, saying his old show “was one guy talking into a microphone and spouting an opinion for three hours.”  I mean, what are the odds of that becoming successful in talk radio????

I believe Don Imus put it best:  “His radio show is cancelled. They’re not revamping anything! He will never ever be on WABC in New York again, ever! Ever!…You know why they got blown out? Because they suck! And he’s a punk and a phony.”

Is this TSA story real? (update)

Thursday, November 18th, 2010

I know this thought might not be too popular, but I’m starting to wonder—is this TSA story real?

To be clear, there are two different elements of this story:

a)  Is the enhanced search policy a good policy?  I think this is perfectly legitimate to argue.

b) Are there a lot of outraged people around the country actually being groped?  I’m a little hesitant on this one.

Over the past week or so, we’ve seen almost all of the highly publicized claims of TSA terror be exposed as being overblown or not current.

Off the top of my head:

1) The 3 year old who was crying in the security line—was actually from two years ago.  And children below twelve are exempt from the searches anyway.

2) The radio host who claimed she was handcuffed to a chair and held for an hour—video seems to indicate she  exaggerated her story greatly.

3) Penn Jillette calls cops after being fondled at airport—that was actually from 8 years ago.

4) The “don’t touch my junk” guy—this just seems suspicious to me.  The agent is courteous and understanding, and the junk guy is obviously trying to make a point.  Remember, he doesn’t say he was groped–he is just putting up fuss about the possibility of potentially being groped.   With the exception of the title “groin check” which is the equivalent of calling a burger a “cow flesh sandwich” —the agent’s description sounds pretty cold and clinical to me.

5) The picture of the nun being searched.  I haven’t confirmed this one yet–but a TSA agent that listens to the 4th hour writes in and says “the picture…the one of a Muslim female officer patting down a nun, is at least 3 years old… She’s wearing our old uniform.”

6) The guy who “punched” the TSA agent in Indianapolis.  It had nothing to do with the new policy.  In fact, the guy wasn’t patted down at all.  He willingly went through the body scanner.  He had “a history of medical issues, including two metal implants, a colostomy bag and a fused right wrist” which started a conversation with security.  Of course, most of these items would have also been spotted by a normal metal detector, but the guy “punched” him anyway.  When the officer asked why the man hit him he replied “I was only kidding with you.”

Again, I think it’s fine to criticize the policy.  I don’t understand why we need to start using the front of the hand instead of  the back of the hand, for example.  I don’t like the possibility of images being saved or sent from the scanners, when we were promised that it wouldn’t happen.  I also recognize that if a terrorist wants to bring a weapon on a plane–he’s going to put it near his junk–and we better figure out how to find it, before he decides to use it.

But, regarding the idea that there is some rash of agents grabbing your noodles for no reason, I just haven’t seen evidence of it happening with any level of regularity.  They get close, sure.  But even the pictures from the Denver airport show close calls, not cup-o-noodles.  Maybe it is going on, but I haven’t seen enough in the news, nor have I seen it once–any of the times I’ve flown.  The whole thing just seems odd to me.

Final reminder that Alan Grayson is awful.

Tuesday, November 2nd, 2010

Alan Grayson is fundraising off of Glenn’s back again…or at least he thinks he is.  From his desperate final fundraising pitch on his Facebook page:

According to the Examiner, this is what Glenn Beck said on the air, earlier this week:

“It’s OK if the Republicans lose every seat in the Senate and the House except for one. As long as that one is Alan Grayson losing.”

Yes, “according to the Examiner” Glenn did say this:

Beck: …It’s okay if the republicans lose every seat in the Senate and the House except for one. As long as that one is Alan Grayson losing.

But, this isn’t the Washington Examiner, the newspaper–it’s Examiner.com–a collection of bloggers.  The Huffington Post, actually gets the story right:

“Sarah,” one of Beck’s co-hosts said, in a playful intro to the discussion. “I’m wondering if you are on board with my personal aspirations here for this election, which is, it’s okay if the republicans lose every seat in the senate and the house except for one, as long as that one is Alan Grayson losing.”

So, Glenn didn’t even say it.  I did.  The Huffington Post has it right.  In fact, even Alan Grayson’s own Wikipedia page has it right.  So, why would you reference a random blogger over the Obama-approved-news-source, the Huffington Post?  Well, because throwing my name around won’t raise any money for you. Glenn’s will.  When Grayson wants something he will say anything.  Remember this research quality next time he’s talking about an important issue.

Interestingly enough, the Examiner.com blogger who posted this story has posted eleven straight stories about Alan Grayson.  Who posts eleven straight stories about Alan Grayson?  (Except for me, of course.)




Please support our sponsors!